![]() If Microsoft added more extensions for people to use, or if it even allowed people to grab whatever apps they please, then I'm sure it'll be a huge hit. Even with this bare-bones test implementation, I'm seriously considering using Microsoft Edge for all my mobile browsing. However, I honestly think that Microsoft will have a lot more success with Edge on mobile if it fleshed out the extension support. I understand why Microsoft went all-in on the AI browser hype after all, artificial intelligence is a huge topic these days. Microsoft Edge's best feature is its extension support In fact, if you pick up a new Android phone and you're on a clean slate, I'd recommend using Edge instead of your default browser and see how you like it. They gave a very clear yes and provided resources to back that up. In addition, uBO is a signed and recommended extension by Mozilla/Firefox which undergoes a code review when a new version is published. This made browsing the web a lot more pleasant than using Chrome for me.Īs such, I recommend giving Microsoft Edge a shot if you've previously disliked how it works on mobile. A manifest file defines the configuration and features of a browser extension. The uBO source code is publicly available and anyone can review it for themselves. Likewise, whenever I visited a website that didn't have a dark mode, Dark Reader would kick in and make the website a lot easier on my eyes. ![]() Most of the focus has been on the uBlock Origin. The update has been controversial, with some changes negatively affecting content blocking extensions (ad blockers). ![]() This is why we continue to hear about hacks and data breaches all the time, yet very rarely observe anything super nasty like backdoors and the like these days on most consumer devices (usually the worst thing I see is ransomware, which typically gets in through an exploit, typically from a malicious ad ironically enough (and the ad is likely to be blocked by one or more of the aforementioned extensions of course, rendering the exploit harmless to those who use such blocking tools) or malicious email attachment).I expected uBlock Origin on Android to struggle with some websites that are renowned for showing lots of advertisements, but I didn't see a single one. Google has been working on a new platform for Chrome extensions over the past few years, called Manifest V3. On the other hand, targeted attackers going after high value targets (such as businesses, websites/servers, government and infrastructural targets etc.) would not target such a plugin/extension because such extensions are not often used in such environments and there are much easier ways into a system (remember, those extensions are sandboxed and the browser runs in a limited user mode with no admin privileges by default) to achieve full access/control over it. ransomware, tech support scams etc.) or scamming money (phishing scams, bogus products etc.) in order to gain the most profits. If you’re a fan of ad blockers, prepare for some change: Google is resuming a plan to phase out older Chrome extensions, including the one for uBlock Origin. The bad guys typically target the largest groups/most commonly used applications so that they can infect as many as possible when the objective is extortion (i.e. Is it possible? Certainly, but not very likely. That would be like the bad guys trying to use your AV to infect you. Has anyone else seen this problem Edit: Problem solved. Once I push the force-install via GPO, whether the endpoint (Win7 SP1) has uBlock installed or not, it ends up being disabled. If you have cases where uBO is detected where uBO Lite is not, please submit a report for this (use the chat icon in uBOs popup panel). If you see a difference, it probably comes down to how you configured uBO. If I manually install uBlock Origin, it is enabled by default. uBlock Origin Lite uses the same default filters as uBlock Origin, minus those which cant be converted to MV3 DNR API. I do not see any issues or performance impact using these together, all fully enabled.Īs for attack surface, I'm not too worried about a blocking browser extension being leveraged in an attack, both because extensions are sandboxed within the browser (a security measure implemented in modern browsers), and because it wouldn't make much sense for attackers to target the kinds of extensions used by those who actually know the risks of online threats and ads and use such tools to enhance their safety/browsing. We are looking to push google chrome out to our users and force-install uBlock Origin extension. I'm currently using Malwarebytes Browser Guard, uBlock Origin, Ghostery, Disconnect, DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials, HTTPS Everywhere, Nano Defender and uBlock Origin Extra in addition to Web Protection in Malwarebytes Premium and a massive HOSTS file currently containing almost 1 million entries and counting. Endpoint Detection & Response for Servers
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |